Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.

2 Assistant Professor, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract

Accessing the information that the elderly of different communities have , is one of the ways to restore traditions that are in danger of destruction. The purpose of this study is to identify the trees, their organs used by forest edge users and the by-products of this ecosystem. Information was recorded in the two ways of conversation in the natives' place of residence and participatory observation, and through field surveys, herbarium samples of tree limbs were collected and identified with reliable sources. For each tree, the local name, organ, used, medicinal properties and how to use them were recorded. In this research, 10 species of trees that were used more by local people were selected. The words expressed in their language for the parts of trees are completely narrative and are named according to their use. They are aware of the vegetative form, places where trees grow, different properties and ways of using tree limbs and how to exploit forest by-products and they use it in their lives.

Keywords

  • -Belcher, Brian., Ruiz-Pérez, Manuel, and Achdiawan, Ramadhani. (2005). “Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: Implications for livelihoods and conservation.” Journal World Development, 33 (9), 1435-1452.
  • -Gadisa, Demie. (2019). “Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products in Rural Communities’ Livelihoods around Chilimo Forest, West Shewa, Ethiopia.” Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 9 (22), 25-37.
  • -Dweba, T.P, and Mearns, Martin A. (2011). “Conserving indigenous knowledge as the key to the current and future use of traditional vegetables.” International Journal of Information Management, 31, 564–571.
  • Kim, In Ae., Trosper, Ronald, and Mohs, Gordon. (2012). “Cultural uses of non timber forest products among the Sts’ailes, Brithish Columbia, Canada.” Forest Policy and Economics, 22, 40-46
  • Paniagua-Zambrana, Narel Y., Bussmann, Rainer W., Hart, Robbie E., Moya Huanca, Araceli L., Ortiz-Soria, Gere., Ortiz-Vaca, Milton., Ortiz-Álvarez, David., Soria-Morán, Jorge., Soria-Morán, Maria., Chávez, Saul., Chávez-Moreno, Bertha., Chávez-Moreno, Ggualberto., Roca, Oscar, and Siripi, Erlin. (2017). “Traditional knowledge hiding in plain sight – twenty-first century ethnobotany of the Chácobo in Beni, Bolivia.” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 13, 1-47.
  • Posey‌, Darrell A. (2002). “Commodification of the sacred through intellectual property rights.” Journal of Ethnopharmacol, 83, 3-12.
  • Qureshi, Rahmatullah, and Bhatti, G. Raza. (2008). “Ethnobotany of plants used by the Thari people of Nara Desert Pakistan.” Journal of Fitoterapia, 79, 468-473.
  • Rokaya, Maan B., Mani, Shrestha, and Suresh kumar, Ghimir. (2005). “Ethnoecology of natural environment in trans-himalyan region of west Nepal.Banko Jankari.” Journal of Forestry Information for Nepal, 15 (2), 33-38.
  • Sheil, Douglas, and Wunder, Sven. (2002).“The value of tropical forest to local communities:Complications, caveats and cautions.”Conservation Ecology, 6 (2), 2- 9.