نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده محیط زیست ، پردیس دانشکده های فنی، دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشکده محیط‌ زیست، پردیس دانشکده‌های فنی، دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشکده تکنولوژی ، دانشگاه هوستون ، آمریکا

4 دانشکده تکنولوژی ، دانشگاه هوستون، تگزاس، آمریکا

5 دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی ، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز

چکیده

نظام‌های ساختاری، عملکردی و مدیریتی پایدار و یکپارچه منابع آبی با تأکید بر درک پـویـایی، تعامل و هم تکاملی نظام‌های پیوسته انسان-آب، مفاهیمی نظیر هیدرولوژی محیط‌زیستی، هیدرولوژی اجتماعی، جامعه‌شناسی آب و... را خلق کرده‌اند. سیر تکاملی علم هیدرولوژی مبتنی بر تئوری سیستم‌های اجتماعی-اکولوژیک با چالش‌های متنوع از جمله حلقه مفقوده سرمایه اجتماعی، مدیریت محلی و بازآفرینی عقلانیت اکولوژیک حاکم بر نظام‌ منابع مشترک روبرو است که ضرورت شناخت تعامل معنایی و هم‌تکاملی عقلانیت اکولوژیک و هیدرولوژی اجتماعی را ایجاب می‌کند. پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی-تحلیلی با هدف تدوین چارچوب مفهومی بسط سیر تکاملی هیدرولوژی اجتماعی مبتنی بر بنیان‌ فکری عقلانیت اکولوژیک حاکم بر میراث آبی کهن است. تحلیل وجوه اشتراک و افتراق عقلانیت اکولوژیک و هیدرولوژی اجتماعی و مسیرهای مطالعاتی آنها مبتنی بر تحلیل مقایسه‎ای انجام شد. نتایج بر تحقق بینش جدید در پرتو عقلانیت اکولوژیک تأکید دارد که ضمن پیوند رویکردهای رویه‌ای و محتوایی، چارچوبی را برای هم تکاملی نظام‎های پیوسته، همراه با پتانسیل درک کامل پیچیدگی‎ها، ارتباطات و بازخوردها، تبدیل تناقظات به تعاملات، تحلیل وقایع گذشته، تقویت مشارکت گروه‌های ذی‎نفع و ذی‎نفوذ، پیش‌بینی پیامدهای درازمدت تصمیمات امروز فراهم آورد و فرایندهای سیاست‌گذاری، تصمیم‌سازی و تدوین راهبردهای مدیریتی کارآمد در مقیاس‌های متنوع محلی، ملی، منطقه‌ای را تسهیل نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

 

  • Angelakis, A. N., Valipour, M., Choo, K.-H., Ahmed, A. T., Baba, A., Kumar, R.,... Wang, Z. (2021). Desalination: from ancient to present and future. Water, 13(16), 2222.
  • Azimi, S., Moghaddam, M.A. & Monfared, S.A.H. (2018). Spatial assessment of the potential of groundwater quality using fuzzy AHP in GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(7), 142-157
  • Berkes, F., J. Colding, & C. Folke, eds. (2003). Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resiliency for complexity and change. New York: Cambridge University
  • Bernard-Jannin, L., Sun, X., Teissier, S., Sauvage, S., & Sanchez-Perez, J.M. (2017). Spatiotemporal analysis of factors controlling nitrate dynamics and potential denitrification hot spots and hot moments in groundwater of an alluvial floodplain. Ecological Engineering, 103, 372–384.
  • Bishop, (2019). Classifying human interventions in nature as a framework for ecological wisdom development. In Ecological Wisdom (pp. 69-86). Springer
  • Blair, P., & Buytaert, W. (2016). Socio-hydrological modelling: a review asking “why, what and how?”.Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 20, 443-478.
  • Calheiros, D.F., A.F. Seidl, & C.J.A. Ferreira. (2000). Participatory research methods in environmental science: Local and scientific knowledge of a limnological phenomenon in the Pantanal Wetland of Brazil. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37(4), 684–96.
  • Chamine, H.I. (2015). Water Resources Meet Sustainability: New Trends in Environmental Hydrogeology and Groundwater Engineering. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 2513–2520. 10.1007/s12665-014- 3986-y
  • X., Wang, D., Tian, F., & Sivapalan, M. (2016). From channelization to restoration: Sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida. Water Resources Research, 52(2), 1227-1244.
  • Durán-Sánchez, A., Del Río-Rama, M., de la, C., Álvarez-García, J., & García-Vélez, D.F. (2019). Mapping of scientific coverage on education for Entrepreneurship in Higher Education. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ, 13, 84–104.
  • Egan, D., & Howell, E.A. (2001). The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist’s guide to reference ecosystems. Island Press, Washington
  • Escriva-Bou, A., Lund, J.R., & Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2018). Saving energy from urban water demand management. Water Resour. Res, 54, 4265–4276.
  • Finger, M., & Verlaan, P. (1995). Learning our way out: A conceptual framework for social-environmental learning. World Development 23(3), 503–13.
  • Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., et al. (2014). SUDS LID BMPs WSUD and more—the evolution and application ofterminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525-542.
  • Fortmann, L., ed. (2008). Participatory research in conservation and rural livelihoods: Doing science together. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Foster, D.R. (2000). Conservation lessons and challenges from ecological history.Forest History Today (fall): 2–11.
  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Gaventa, J. (1993). The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: knowledge struggles in an information age. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.). Voices of change. Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 21–40). Westport, : Bergin & Garvey.
  • Gaventa, J. (1988). Participatory research in North America. Convergence 24 (2-3), 19–28.
  • Hjorth, P. & Madani, K. (2014). Sustainability monitoring and assessment: New challenges require new thinking. Water Resour. Plan. Manag, 140, 133–135.
  • Hjorth, P., & Madani, K. (2013). Systems Analysis to Promote Frames and Mental Models for Sustainable Water Management. In Proceedings of the 3rdWorld Sustainability Forum, Basel, Switzerland, 1–30 November p. f003.
  • Hornberger, G.M., & Perrone, D. (2019).Water Resources: Science and Society. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Housh, M., Cai, X., Ng, T.L., McIsaac, G.F., Ouyang, Y., Khanna, M., Sivapalan, M., Jain, A.K., Eckho_, S., Gasteyer, S., & et al. (2015). System of systems model for analysis of biofuel development. Infrastruct. Syst. 21, 04014050.
  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2018). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy: Routledge.
  • Khan, S., Dialynas, E., Kasaraneni, V., & Angelakis, A. (2020). Similarities of Minoan and Indus Valley hydro-technologies. Sustainability, 12(12), 4897.
  • Krasny, E., C. Lundholm, & R. Plummer. (2010a). Resilience in social–ecological systems: The roles of learning and education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5–6), 463–74
  • Kurtz, C.F., & Snowden, D.J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst. J., 42, 462–483.
  • Lane, S.N. (2014). Acting, predicting and intervening in a sociohydrological world. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 927-952.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University
  • Levy, M. C., Garcia, M., Blair, P., Chen, X., Gomes, S. L., Gower, D. B., ... & Marston, L. (2016). Wicked but worth it: student perspectives on socio-hydrology. Process, 30(9), 1467-1472
  • Liu, Y., Tian, F., Hu, H., & Sivapalan, M. (2014). Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River Basin, Western China: the Taiji–Tire Model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289–1303, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1289- 2014.
  • Lund, J.R. (2015). Integrating social and physical sciences in water management. Water Resour. Res., 51, 5905–5918.
  • Madani, K., & Shafiee-Jood, M. (2020). Socio-hydrology: a new understanding to unite or a new science to divide? Water, 12(7), 1941-1956.
  • Madani, K.; Khatami, S. (2015). Water for energy: Inconsistent assessment standards and inability to judge properly, Sustain. Energy Rep, 2, 10–16.
  • McCurley, K.L., & Jawitz, J.W. (2017). Hyphenated hydrology: Interdisciplinary evolution of water resource science. Water Resour. Res., 53, 2972–2982.
  • Megdiche-Kharrat, F., Zheng, X. Y., Moussa, M., Famin, Z., & Angelakis, A. N. (2020). Historic hydraulic works: paradigms of traditional good water governance, integrity and sustainability. Water Supply, 20(7), 2484-2498.
  • Milly, P.C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R.M., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Lettenmaier, D.P., & Stouffer, R.J. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319, 573-574.
  • Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003(. Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mirchi, A., Watkins, D.J., & Madani, K. (2010). Modeling for watershed planning, management, and decision making.In Watersheds: Management, Restoration and Environmental Impact; Nova Science Pub Inc.: London, UK, ISBN 9781616686673.
  • Mondal, , Bandyopadhyay, J., & Chowdhury, P. (2019). A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in Jangalmahal area, West Bengal, India. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 5(2), 557-573.
  • Nelson, N., & S. Wright. eds. (1995). Power and participatory development: Theory and practice. London: Immediate Technology Productions.
  • Pande, S., & Sivapalan, M. (2016). Progress in socio-hydrology: A meta-analysis of challenges and opportunities. WIREs Water, 4, e1193.
  • Park, P., M. Brydon-Miller, & B. Hall. (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin and Gravey.
  • Parsons, M., Nalau, J., Fisher, K., & Brown, C. (2019). Disrupting path dependency: making room for Indigenous knowledge in river management. Glob Environ Change, 56, 95-113.
  • Patten, D. T. (2016). The role of ecological wisdom in managing for sustainable interdependent urban and natural ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 3-10.
  • Pickett, S. T., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., McDonnell, M. J., & Zhou, W. (2016). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem health and Sustainability, 2(7), e01229.
  • Radaei, M., Salehi, E., Faryadi, S., Masnavi, M. R., & Zebardast, L. (2020). Ecological wisdom, a social–ecological approach to environmental planning with an emphasis on water resources: the case of Qanat Hydraulic Structure (QHS) in a desert city of Iran. Environment, development and sustainability, 1-22.
  • Ray, S., & Ray, A. (2019). Major ground water development issues in South Asia: an overview. Ground Water Development-Issues and Sustainable Solutions, 3-11.
  • Reason, P., & H. Bradbury. eds. (2006). Handbook of action research. ondon/ Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
  • Reid, A., Bruun Jensen, B., Nikel, J., & Simovska, V. (2008). Participation and learning:Developing perspectives on education and the environment, Health and Sustainability. In Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability, ed. A. Reid, B. Bruun Jensen, J. Nikel, and V. Simovska, 1–18. The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Ringler, C., & Cai, X. (2006). Valuing fisheries and wetlands using integrated economic-hydrologic modeling—Mekong river basin. Water Resour. Plan. Manag, 132, 480–487.
  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
  • Rocheleau, D. (1994). Participatory research and the race to save the planet: Questions, critique, and lessons from the field. Agriculture and Human Values 11(2–3), 4–25.
  • Rosenberg, D.E. & Madani, K. (2014). Water resources systems analysis: A bright past and a challenging but promising future. Water Resour. Plan. Manag, 140, 407–409.
  • Schlueter, M., Mcallister, R.R., Arlinghaus, R., Bunnefeld, N., Eisenack, K., Hoelker, F., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Müller, B., Nicholson, E., & Quaas, M. (2012). New horizons for managing the environment: A review of coupled social-ecological systems modeling. Natural Resource Modeling, 25(1), 219-272
  • Scott, C., Vicuña, S., Blanco-Gutiérrez, , Meza, F., & VarelaOrtega, C. (2013). Irrigation efficiency and water-policy implications for river-basin resilience. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(4), 1339-1348
  • Sivapalan, M., Konar, M., Srinivasan, V., Chhatre, A., Wutich, A.,
  • Scott, C., Wescoat, J.L., & Rodríguez-Iturbe, (2014). Socio hydrology: Use-inspired water sustaninability science for the Anthropocene. Earth's Future, 2(4), 225-230.
  • Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H.H.G., & Blöschl, G. (2012). Sociohydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26,1270-1276.
  • Sheppard, E., & McMaster, R. B. (2008). Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Srinivasan, V. (2015). Reimagining the past–use of counterfactual trajectories in socio-hydrological modelling: The case of Chennai, India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(2),785-801.
  • Srinivasan, V., Lambin, E.F., Gorelick, S.M., Thompson, B.H., & Rozelle, S. (2012). The nature and causes of the global water crisis: Syndromes from a meta-analysis of coupled human-water studies. Water Resources Research, 48:W10516
  • Steiner, F. (2014). Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 304-311
  • Troy, T.J., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., & Evans, T.P. (2015b). Debates perspectives on socio-hydrology: Sociohydrologic modeling: Tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation. Water Resources Research, 51, 4806-4814.
  • Vallenga, D., Grypdonck, M., Hoogwerf, L., & Tan, F. (2009). Action research: What, why and how? Acta Neurologica Belgica, 109, 81–90.
  • Viglione, A., Di Baldassarre, G., Brandimarte, L., Kuil, L., Carr, G., Salinas, J.L., Scolobig, A., & Blöschl, G. (2014). Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk-roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust. Journal of Hydrology, 518, 71-82.
  • Vigneswaran, S., & Sivapalan, M. (2014). Sociohydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: a case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 1027-1041.
  • Wang, X., Palazzo, D., & Carper, M. (2016a). “Ecological wisdom as an emerging field of scholarly inquiry in urban planning and design”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 100–107.

       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.019.

  • Wesselink, A., Kooy, M., & Warner, J. (2017). Socio-hydrology and hydrosocial analysis: toward dialogues across disciplines. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4(2), e1196.
  • Whyte, W. F., Greenwood, D. J., & Lazes, P. (1991). Participatory action research: through practice to science in social research. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.). Participatory action research (pp. 19–55). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Wilmsen, C., Elmendorf, W., Fisher, L., Ross, J., Sarathy, B., Wells, G., &eds. (2008). Partnerships for empowerment: Participatory research for community-based natural resource management. London: Earthscan.
  • Xiang, W.N. (2014). Ecological Wisdom for Urban Sustainability: Doing real and permanent good in ecological practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 65–69.
  • Young, R. F., & Lieberknecht, K. (2019). From smart cities to wise cities: ecological wisdom as a basis for sustainable urban development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(10), 1675-1692.
  • Zanetell, B. A., & Knuth, B. A. (2002). Knowledge partnerships: rapid rural appraisal's role in catalyzing community-based management in Venezuela. Society &Natural Resources, 15(9), 805-825.
  • Radaei, M., Salehi, E., Faryadi, S., Masnavi, M. R., & Zebardast, L. (2020). Recognition of Ecological Wisdom Principles in the ancient Hydraulic structures of Desert Cities (Case Study: Vaghf-abad Qanat of Yazd). Indigenous Knowledge, 7(13), 1-51. doi:10.22054/2020.53633.1219. [in persian].
  • Radaei, M., Salehi, E., Faryadi, S., Masnavi, M. R., & Zebardast, L. (2021). Expanding Ecological Wisdom through Social Learning in Planning of Resilient Cities. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development.xxx. [in persian].